Compromiso laboral: nueva escala para su medición

Work Engagement: New scale for its measurement

Francisco Prieto-Díez , Álvaro Postigo , Marcelino Cuesta , José Muñiz
Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, (2021), 53, pp. 133-142.
Recibido el 22 de enero de 2021
Aceptado el 2 de agosto de 2021

https://doi.org/10.14349/rlp.2021.v53.15

Resumen

Introducción. Uno de los factores más determinantes del rendimiento laboral es el grado de compromiso de las personas con las actividades que realizan. El objetivo de esta investigación es el desarrollo y análisis psicométrico de una nueva escala para la evaluación del compromiso laboral. Método. Se empleó una muestra de 599 trabajadores en activo, el 51% clasificados como emprendedores. El 53% fueron hombres y la media de edad fue de 44.41 años (DT = 8.78). Resultados. La nueva escala desarrollada consta de 10 ítems y muestra una estructura esencialmente unidimensional. La fiabilidad fue excelente (α = .92; ω = .92), y se obtuvieron evidencias de validez en relación con el Clima Organizacional (r = .540), Personalidad Emprendedora (r = .701), Felicidad (r = .674), Reparación Emocional (r = .470), y Estabilidad Emocional (r = .440). Conclusión. La escala desarrollada para la evaluación del compromiso laboral muestra unas buenas propiedades psicométricas, constituyendo una herramienta muy adecuada para su utilización tanto en investigación como en contextos profesionales aplicados.

Palabras clave
Compromiso laboral, evaluación, rendimiento laboral, propiedades psicométricas

Abstract

Introduction. One of the most determining factors of work performance is the degree of engagement of people to the activities they carry out. The objective of this research is the development and psychometric analysis of a new scale for the evaluation of work engagement. Method. A sample of 599 active workers was used, 51% classified as entrepreneurs. 53% were men and the mean age was 44.41 years (SD = 8.78). Results. The new scale consists of 10 items and shows an essentially one-dimensional structure. Reliability was excellent (α = .92; ω = .92), and evidence of validity was obtained in relation to Organizational Climate (r = .540), Entrepreneurial Personality (r = .701), Happiness (r = .674), Emotional Repair (r = .470), and Emotional Stability (r = .440). Conclusion. The scale developed for the evaluation of work engagement shows good psychometric properties, constituting a very suitable tool for its use both in research and in applied professional contexts.

Keywords:
Work engagement, assessment, work performance, psychometric properties

Artículo Completo
Bibliografía

APA, AERA, & NCME. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Psychological Association.

Baker, F. (1985). The basics of item response theory. Heineman.

Bakker, A. B., Albrecht, S. L., & Leiter, M. P. (2011). Key questions regarding work engagement. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(1) 4-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2010.485352

Bakker, A. B., & Oerlemans, W. G. (2019). Daily job crafting and momentary work engagement: A self-determination and self-regulation perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112, 417-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.12.005

Barría-González, J., Postigo, Á., Pérez-Luco, R., Cuesta, M., & García-Cueto, E. (2021). Evaluación de Clima Organizacional: Propiedades psicométricas del ECALS. Anales de Psicología, 37(1), 168-177. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.417571

Blanca, M. J., Escobar, M., Lima, J. F., Byrne, D., & Alarcon, R. (2020). Psychometric properties of a short form of the Adolescent Stress Questionnaire (ASQ-14). Psicothema, 32(2), 261-267. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2019.288

Cai, L., Thissen, D., & Du Toit, S. (2011). IRTPRO: Flexible, multidimensional, multiple categorical IRT modeling. Scientific Software International.

Calderón-Garrido, C., Navarro-González, D., Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2019). Multidimensional or essentially unidimensional? A multi-faceted factor-analytic approach for assessing the dimensionality of tests and items. Psicothema, 31(4), 450-457. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2019.153

Castellano, E., Muñoz Navarro, R., Toledo, M. S., Spontón, C., & Medrano, L. A. (2019). Cognitive processes of emotional regulation, Burnout and work engagement. Psicothema, 31(1), 73-80. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.228

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Erlbaum.

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). The five-factor model of personality and its relevance to personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 6(4), 343-359. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.1992.6.4.343

Cuesta, M., Suárez-Álvarez, J., Lozano, L. M., García-Cueto, E., & Muñiz, J. (2018). Assessment of eight entrepreneurial personality dimensions: Validity evidence of the BEPE battery. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(2352), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02352

Erickson, T. J. (2005). The 21st century workplace: Preparing for tomorrow’s employment trends today. Testimony submitted before the U.S. Senate Committee on health, education, labor, and pensions, National Consumer Law Center.

Evers, A., Muñiz, J., Hagemeister, C., Hstmaelingen, A., Lindley, P., Sjöberg, A., & Bartram, D. (2013). Assesing the quality of tests: Revision of the EFPA review model. Psicothema, 25(3), 283-291. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.97

Fernández-Berrocal, P., Extremera, N., & Ramos, N. (2004). Validity and reliability of the Spanish modified version of the Trait Meta-Mood Scale. Psychological Reports, 94, 751-755. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.94.3.751-755

Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2017). Program FACTOR at 10: Origins, development and future directions. Psicothema, 29(2), 236-240. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.304

Fisher, C. D. (2010). Happiness at Work. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(4), 384–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00270.x

Gómez-Benito, J., Hidalgo, M. D., & Zumbo, B. D. (2013). Effectiveness of combining statistical tests and effect sizes when using logistic discriminant function regression to detect differential item functioning for polytomous items. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(5), 875-897. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413492419

Gorgievski, M. J., Bakker, A. B., & Wilmar, B. S. (2010). Work engagement and workaholism: Comparing the self-employed and salaried employees. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(1), 83-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760903509606

Guest, D. (2014). Employee engagement: A sceptical analysis. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 1(2), 141-156. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-04-2014-0017

Gupta, N., & Sharma, V. (2016). Exploring employee engagement— A way to better business performance. Global Business Review17(3), 45S-63S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150916631082

Halbesleben, J. R. (2010). A meta-analysis of work engagement: Relationships with Burnout, demands, resources and consequences. En A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 118-131). Psychology Press.

Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268-279.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

IBM Corp. (2016). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0 [Computer software]. IBM Corp.

Irwing, P. (ed.), (2018). The Wiley handbook of psychometric testing: A multidisciplinary reference on survey, scale and test development. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724. https://doi.org/10.5465/256287

Knight, C., Patterson, M., & Dawson, J. (2017). Building work engagement: A systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the effectiveness of work engagement interventions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(6), 792–812. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2167

Laguna, M., Razmus, W., & Żaliński, A. (2017). Dynamic relationships between personal resources and work engagement in entrepreneurs. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 90(2), 248-269. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12170

Lane, S., Raymond, M. R., & Haladyna, T. M. (2016). Handbook of test development (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Lesener, T., Gusy, B., Jochmann, A., & Wolter, C. (2020). The drivers of work engagement: a meta-analytic review of longitudinal evidence. Work & Stress, 34(3), 259-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2019.1686440

Lisbona, A., Palaci, F., Salanova, M., & Frese, M. (2018). The effects of work engagement and self-efficacy on personal initiative and performance. Psicothema, 30(1), 89-96. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.245

Macey, W., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(1), 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.0002.x

Mañas-Rodríguez, M. Á., Alcaraz-Pardo, L., Pecino-Medina, V., & Limbert, C. (2016). Validation of the Spanish version of Soane’s ISA Engagement Scale. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 32(2), 87-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpto.2016.04.002

Martínez, I. M., Salanova, M., & Cruz-Ortiz, V. (2020). Our boss is a good boss! Cross-level effects of transformational leadership on work engagement in service jobs. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 36(2), 87-94. https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2020a10

Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., & Leiter, M. P. (1996). MBI: Maslach Burnout inventory. CPP, Incorporated.

Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job Burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 397-422. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397

Moreno, R., Martínez, R. J., & Muñiz, J. (2018). Test item taxonomy based on functional criteria. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1175. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01175

Muñiz, J. (2018). Introducción a la psicometría. Pirámide.

Muñiz, J., & Fonseca-Pedrero, E. (2019). Ten steps for test development. Psicothema, 31(1), 7-16. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.291

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus User’s Guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.

Peña-Suárez, E., Muñiz, J., Campillo-Álvarez, Á., Fonseca-Pedrero, E., & García-Cueto, E. (2013). Assessing organizational climate: Psychometric properties of the CLIOR Scale. Psicothema, 25(1), 137-144. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2012.260

Petrou, P., Demerouti, E., Peeters, M. C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Hetland, J. (2012). Crafting a job on a daily basis: Contextual correlates and the link to work engagement. Journal of Organizational Behavior33(8), 1120-1141. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1783

Postigo, Á., Cuesta, M., Fernández-Alonso, R., García-Cueto, E., & Muñiz, J. (2021a). Academic grit modulates school performance evolution over time: A latent transition analysis. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 26(2), 87-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2021.03.001

Postigo, Á., Cuesta, M., Fernández-Alonso, R., García-Cueto, E., & Muñiz, J. (2021b). Temporal stability of grit and school performance in adolescents: A longitudinal perspective. Psicología Educativa27(1), 77-84. https://doi.org/10.5093/psed2021a4

Postigo, Á., Cuesta, M., & García-Cueto, E. (2021c). Entrepreneurial personality, conscientiousness, self-control, and grit: The psychological side of self-employment. Anales de Psicología37(2), 361-370. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.453711

Postigo, Á., García-Cueto, E., Cuesta, M., Menéndez-Aller, A., Prieto-Díez, F., & Lozano, L. M. (2020). Assessment of the enterprising personality: A short form of the BEPE battery. Psicothema, 32(4), 575-582. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2020.193

Ramírez-García, C., García-Álvarez de Perea, J., & García-Del Junco, J. (2019). La Felicidad en el trabajo: validación de una escala de medida. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 59(5), 327-340. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-759020190503

Ruiz-Zorrilla, P., Hernández, X., de Roda, A. B., Antino, M., & Rodriguez-Muñoz, A. (2020). Exploring daily patterns of work engagement among teachers: A latent growth modeling approach. Psicothema32(3), 374-381. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2020.57

Robertson-Smith, G., & Markwick, C. (2009). Employee engagement: A review of current thinking. Institute for Employment Studies.

Rothbard, N. P., & Patil, S. V. (2012). Being there: work engagement and positive organizational psychology. En K. S. Cameron & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 231-243). Oxford University Press.

Saks, A. M. (2019). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement revisited. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 6(1) 19-38. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-06-2018-0034

Salanova, M., Agut, S., & Peiró, J. (2005). Linking organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty: The mediation of service climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1217-1227. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1217

Salanova, M., & Llorens, S. (2008). Current state of research on Burnout and future challenges. Papeles del Psicólogo, 29(1) 59-67.

Salanova, M., Schaufeli, W. B., Llorens-Gumbau, S., Silla, P., & Grau-Gumbau, R. M. (2000). Desde el Burnout al engagement: ¿una nueva perspectiva? Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16(2), 117-134.

Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and Burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71-92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326

Sireci, S., & Faulkner-Bond, M. (2014). Validity evidence based on test content. Psicothema, 26(1), 100-107. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.256

Soane, E., Truss, C., Alfes, K., Shantz, A., Rees, C., & Gatenby, M. (2012). Development and application of a new measure of employee engagement: The ISA engagement scale. Human Resource Development International, 15(5), 529-547. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2012.726542

Soares, M. E., & Mosquera, P. (2019). Fostering work engagement: The role of the psychological contract. Journal of Business Research, 101, 469-476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.003

Spontón, C. L., Trógolo, M. A., Castellano, E., Morera, L. P., & Medrano, L. (2019). Desarrollo y validación de una escala para medir satisfacción con los recursos laborales. Suma Psicológica, 26(1), 64-74. https://doi.org/10.14349/sumapsi.2019.v26.n1.8

Timmerman, M. E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 209-220. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023353

Tisu, L., Lupșa, D., Vîrgă, D., & Rusu, A. (2020). Personality characteristics, job performance and mental health: the mediating role of work engagement. Personality and Individual Differences, 153, 109644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109644

The Jamovi Project (2021). Jamovi (Version 1.6) [Computer Software]. https://www.jamovi.org

Vesga-Rodríguez, J. J., Rubiano, M. G., Forero-Aponte, C., Aguilar-Bustamante, M. C., Jaramillo, J. Á., Quiroz-González, E., Castaño-González, E. J., Andrade-Jaramillo, V., & Gómez-Vélez, M. A. (2020). Aspectos de la cultura organizacional y su relación con la disposición al cambio organizacional. Suma Psicológica27(1), 52-61. https://doi.org/10.14349/sumapsi.2020.v27.n1.7

Vigil-Colet, A., Morales-Vives, F., Camps, E., Tous, J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2013). Development and validation of the Overall Personality Assessment Scale (OPERAS). Psicothema, 25(1), 100-106. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2011.411

Vigil-Colet, A., Navarro-González, D., & Morales-Vives, F. (2020). To reverse or to not reverse Likert-type items: That is the question. Psicothema, 32(1), 108-114. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2019.286

PDF