The Factorial Invariance of the Satisfaction in Couple Relationship Scale (SCR) based on the variables sex, living together, and having children
Invariancia factorial de la Escala de Satisfacción en la Relación de Pareja (SCR) en función de las variables sexo, convivencia y tener hijos
María-Teresa Iglesias-García
,
Antonio Urbano-Contreras
,
Raquel-Amaya Martínez-González
Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, (2025), 57, pp. 61-69.
Received 9 December 2024
Accepted 28 April 2025
Antecedentes: Los estudios de investigación sobre satisfacción con la relación de pareja demuestran que las diferencias en la satisfacción dependen en gran medida de tres variables sociodemográficas: sexo (hombre/mujer), convivencia (sí/no) y tener hijos (sí/no). La Escala de Satisfacción en la Relación de Pareja (SCR) ha demostrado un gran potencial para medir la satisfacción en las relaciones de pareja. Este estudio pretende demostrar su invariancia factorial en función de dichas variables. Método: Se realizaron análisis factoriales confirmatorios en submuestras de mujeres y hombres, personas que conviven y no conviven, y personas que tienen y no tienen hijos. También se realizó un análisis factorial multigrupo para comprobar la invariancia factorial de la SCR en función de las variables mencionadas anteriormente. Resultados: Los resultados obtenidos mostraron invariancia factorial, invariancia métrica e invariancia fuerte para las tres variables, e invariancia estricta respecto a la variable “sexo”. También se confirmó que los hombres, las personas que no conviven y las personas sin hijos están más satisfechos con sus relaciones que las mujeres, las personas que conviven y las personas con hijos. Conclusiones: La escala ha demostrado una adecuada invariancia factorial para las variables analizadas, confirmando la posibilidad de su utilización para diferentes tipos de muestra.
Palabras clave:
Validación del instrumento, escala, invarianza factorial, relación de pareja, satisfacción marital
Background: Research studies aimed at evaluating satisfaction with the couple relationship demonstrate that differences in satisfaction largely depend on three sociodemographic variables: sex (men/women), living together (yes/no), and having children (yes/no). The Satisfaction in Couple Relationship Scale (SCR) has shown great potential in measuring satisfaction in couple relationships. This study aims to demonstrate its factorial invariance to these three variables. Method: Confirmatory factor analyses were carried out on subsamples of women and men, people who live together and those who do not cohabit, and people who have children and those who do not have children. A multigroup factor analysis was also performed to test the factorial invariance of the SCR based on the variables mentioned above. Result: The obtained results showed factorial invariance, metric invariance, and strong invariance for all three variables, and strict invariance concerning the “sex” variable. It was also confirmed that men, people who do not cohabit, and people without children, are more satisfied with their relationships than women, people who cohabit, and people with children. Conclusion: The scale has demonstrated an adequate factorial invariance for the analysed variables, confirming the possibility of using it for different sample types.
Keywords:
Instrument validation, scale, factorial invariance, couple relationship, marital satisfaction
Al-Darmaki, F. R., Hassane, S. H., Ahammed, S., Abdullah, A. S., Yaaqeib, S. I., & Dodeen, H. (2016). Marital satisfaction in the United Arab Emirates: Development and validation of a culturally relevant scale. Journal of Family Issues, 37(12), 1703-1729. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X14547418
Álvarez, E., & García, M. (2017). Estilos de amor y culpa como predictores de la satisfacción marital en hombres y mujeres. Enseñanza e Investigación en Psicología, 22(1), 76-85.
Boerner, K., Jopp, D. S., Carr, D., Sosinsky, L., & Kim, S. K. (2014). “His” and “her” marriage? The role of positive and negative marital characteristics in global marital satisfaction among older adults. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69(4), 579-589. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbu032
Bogdan, I., Turliuc, M. N., & Candel, O. S. (2022). Transition to parenthood and marital satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 901362. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.901362
Braithwaite, S., & Holt-Lunstad, J. (2017). Romantic relationships and mental health. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 120-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.001
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long, (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 133-162). Sage.
Butt, M. M., Asif, S., Yahya, F., Fazli, S. K., & Hania, A. (2014). Children perception of inter-parental conflicts and their cognitive emotion regulation. World Applied Sciences Journal, 31(6), 1118-1130.
Carlson, D. L., Hanson, S., & Fitzroy, A. (2016). The division of child care, sexual intimacy, and relationship quality in couples. Gender & Society, 30(3), 442-466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243215626709
Cassepp-Borges, V., Gonzales, J. E., Frazier, A., & Ferrer, E. (2023). Love and relationship satisfaction as a function of romantic relationship stages. Trends in Psychology, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43076-023-00333-4
Cepukiene, V. (2019). Does relationship satisfaction always mean satisfaction? Development of the couple relationship satisfaction scale. Journal of Relationships Research, 10(14), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1017/jrr.2019.12
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indices to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
Cheung, G., & Rensvold, R. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
Collins, W. A., Welsh, D. P., & Furman, W. (2009). Adolescent romantic relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(25), 631-652. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163459
Corra, M., Carter, S. K., Carter, J. S., & Knox, D. (2009). Trends in marital happiness by gender and race, 1973 to 2006. Journal of Family Issues, 30(10), 1379-1404. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X09336214
Cuenca, M. L., Graña, J. L., Peña, M. E., & Andreu, J. M. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) in a community sample of couples. Psicothema, 25(4), 536-541. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.85
DeShon, R. P. (2004). Measures are not invariant across groups without error variance homogeneity. Psychology Science, 46(1), 137-149.
Doss, B. D., & Rhoades, G. K. (2017). The transition to parenthood: Impact on couples’ romantic relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 25-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.003
Doss, B. D., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2009). The effect of the transition to parenthood on relationship quality: An 8-year prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 601-619. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013969
Evans, A., Gray, E., & Reimondos, A. (2023). Having a partner or living with a partner: Differences in life satisfaction and mental health. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 18(5), 2295-2313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-023-10186-9
Faulkner, R. A., Davey, M., & Davey, A. (2005). Gender-Related predictors of change in marital satisfaction and marital conflict. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 33(1), 61-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926180590889211
Foran, H. M., Mueller, J., Schulz, W., & Hahlweg, K. (2022). Cohabitation, relationship stability, relationship adjustment, and children’s mental health over 10 years. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 746306. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.746306
Fundación Foessa (2014). VII Informe sobre exclusión y desarrollo social en España, 2014. Cáritas España.
Gambrel, L. E., Faas, C., Kaestle, C. E., & Savla, J. (2016). Interpersonal neurobiology and couple relationship quality: A longitudinal model. Contemporary Family Therapy, 38(3), 272-283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-016-9381-y
Goodman, L. A. (1961). Snowball sampling. Annals of mathematical statistics, 32(1), 148-170. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177705148
Graham, J. M., Diebels, K. J., & Barnow, Z. B. (2011). The reliability of relationship satisfaction: A reliability generalization meta-analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 25(1), 39-48. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022441
Gustavson, K., Røysamb, E., Borren, I., Torvik, F. A., & Karevold, E. (2016). Life satisfaction in close relationships: Findings from a longitudinal study. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 1293-1311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9643-7
Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 50(1), 93-98. https://doi.org/10.2307/352430
Hidalgo, M. V., & Menéndez, S. (2009). Apoyo a las familias durante el proceso de transición a la maternidad y la paternidad. Familia: Revista de Ciencias y Orientación Familiar, 38, 133-152.
Hoelter, J. W. (1983). Factorial invariance and self-esteem: Reassessing race and sex differences. Social Forces, 61(3), 834-846. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/61.3.834
Huss, B., & Pollmann-Schult, M. (2020). Relationship satisfaction across the transition to parenthood: The impact of conflict behavior. Journal of Family Issues, 41(3), 383-411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X19876084
Jackson, J. B., Miller, R. B., Oka, M., & Henry, R. G. (2014). Gender differences in marital satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(1), 105-129. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12077
Józefacka, N. M., Szpakiewicz, E., Lech, D., Guzowski, K., & Kania, G. (2023). What matters in a relationship— Age, sexual satisfaction, relationship length, and interpersonal closeness as predictors of relationship satisfaction in young adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(5), 4103. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054103
Markland, D. (2007). The golden rule is that there are no golden rules: A commentary on Paul Barrett’s recommendations for reporting model fit in structural equation modelling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 851-858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.023
Martins, L. B., Marengo, L. A. S., Casalecchi, J. G. S., de Almeida, M. J., & Silva, M. D. (2023). A systematic review of the relationship between marital satisfaction and adult’s attachment styles: An evolutionary and cross-cultural perspective. Trends in Psychology, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43076-023-00325-4
Maureira, F. (2011). Los cuatro componentes de la relación de pareja. Revista Electrónica de Psicología Iztacala, 14(1), 321-332.
Mesquita, M., Barreiros, J., Gracia, F. J., & Tomás, I. (2022). Adaptation and evidence of validity of the Corporate Ethical Virtues Scale in Brazil: A measure of ethical culture in organisations. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 54, 23-32. https://doi.org/10.14349/rlp.2022.v54.3
Miret, P. (2016). Cambios en los hogares y en la familia: España en el siglo XXI en el contexto europeo. Panorama Social, 23, 91-107.
Moreno, L., & Gutiérrez, G. (2023). Adaptación al español del Ideal Partner and Relationship Scale (IPRS): evidencias sobre propiedades psicométricas. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 55, 183-193. https://doi.org/10.14349/rlp.2023.v55.20
Okhotnikov, I. A., & Wood, N. D. (2020). Adaptation of the Couples satisfaction index into Russian. Contemporary Family Therapy, 42, 140-151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-019-09517-6
Perelli-Harris, B., Hoherz, S., Lappegård, T., & Evans, A. (2019). Mind the “happiness” gap: The relationship between cohabitation, marriage, and subjective well-being in the United Kingdom, Australia, Germany, and Norway. Demography, 56(4), 1219-1246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-019-00792-4
Roach, A. R., Browden, R., & Frazier, T. (1981). The Marital Satisfaction Scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43(3), 537-546. https://doi.org/10.2307/351755
Santos-Iglesias, P., Vallejo-Medina, P., & Sierra, J. C. (2009). Propiedades psicométricas de una versión breve de la Escala de Ajuste Diádico en muestras españolas. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 9(3), 501-517. http://hdl.handle.net/10481/33036
Schumm, W. R. (2015). Navigating treacherous waters-one researcher’s 40 years of experience with controversial scientific research. Comprehensive Psychology, 4. https://doi.org/10.2466/17.CP.4.24
Schumm, W. A., Nichols, C. W., Schectman, K. L., & Grigsby, C. C. (1983). Characteristics of responses to the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale by a sample of 84 married mothers. Psychological Reports, 53(2), 567-572. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1983.53.2.567
Simó-Noguera, C, Hernández-Monleón, A., Muñoz-Rodríguez, D., & González-Sanjuán, M. E. (2015). El efecto del estado civil y de la convivencia en pareja en la salud. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 151, 141-166. https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.151.141
Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.2307/350547
Stack, S., & Eshleman, J. R. (1998). Marital status and happiness: A 17-Nation study. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60(2), 527-536. https://doi.org/10.2307/353867
Urbano Contreras, A. (2018). Relaciones de pareja e implicaciones familiares: análisis de necesidades socioeducativas [Tesis doctoral]. Universidad de Oviedo.
Urbano-Contreras, A., Iglesias-García, M. T., & Martínez-González, R. A. (2019). General and sexual satisfaction with the couple relationship according to the gender. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 165, 143-158. https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.165.143
Urbano-Contreras, A., Iglesias-García, M. T., & Martínez-González, R. A. (2017). Development and Validation of the Satisfaction in Couple Relationship Scale (SCR). Contemporary Family Therapy, 39(1), 54-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-016-9400-z
Urbano Contreras, A., Martínez González, R. A., & Iglesias García, M. T. (2021). Revisión sistemática de las investigaciones sobre relaciones de pareja en países hispanohablantes (2000-2018). Interdisciplinaria – Revista de Psicología y Ciencias Afines, 38(3), 25-48. https://doi.org/10.16888/interd.2021.38.3.2
Urbano-Contreras, A., Martínez-González, R. A., & Iglesias-García, M. T. (2018). Parenthood as a determining factor of satisfaction in couple relationships. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(5), 1492-1501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0990-3
Valarezo-Bravo, O. F., Guzmán-González, M., & Garrido-Rojas, L. (2024). Apego en la adultez: una revisión sistemática de la investigación latinoamericana durante los últimos 10 años. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 56, 101-118. https://doi.org/10.14349/rlp.2024.v56.11
Varela, J., Mujica, P., Melipillán, R., Benavente, M., & Villacura, P. (2023). Preschool and school aggression: Adaptation and Validation of the Preschool Social Behavior Scale in Chile. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 32(2), 85-94. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v32n2.92600
Ventura-León, J., Lino-Cruz, C., Tocto-Muñoz, S., Sánchez-Villena, A. R., Martinez-Munive, R., Casiano-Valdivieso, K., & Talledo-Sánchez, K. (2024). Evidence of validity of a Jealousy Scale in Peruvian youth and adults: An item response theory approach. Suma Psicológica, 31(2), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.14349/sumapsi.2024.v31.n2.2
Villagrán, A. M., Martín-Fernández, M., Gracia, E., & Lila, M. (2023). Validación de la escala de gravedad percibida de la violencia de pareja contra la mujer en población ecuatoriana. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 55, 29-37. https://doi.org/10.14349/rlp.2023.v55.4
Wang, H., Xu, C., & Fan, X. (2019). Effect of marital relationship on women’s quality of life: Testing the mediating role of subjective well-being. Journal of Community Psychology, 47(2), 327-337. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22123
Ward, P. J., Lundberg, N. R., Zabriskie, R. B., & Berrett, K. (2009). Measuring marital satisfaction: A comparison of the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale and the Satisfaction with Married Life Scale. Marriage and Family Review, 45(4), 412-429. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494920902828219
Wu, A. D., Li, Z., & Zumbo, B. D. (2007). Decoding the meaning of factorial invariance and updating the practice of multigroup confirmatory factor analysis: A demonstration with TIMSS data. Practical Assessment, Research, & Evaluation, 12(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.7275/mhqa-cd89
Yárnoz, S. (2006). ¿Seguimos descuidando a los padres? El papel del padre en la dinámica familiar y su influencia en el bienestar psíquico de sus componentes. Anales de Psicología, 22(2), 175-185. https://revistas.um.es/analesps/article/view/25781