Cross-national measurement invariance of the Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire for clinical psychology professionals and trainees

Invarianza de medición transnacional del Cuestionario de Pensamiento Perseverativo para profesionales y estudiantes de psicología clínica

Leandra Ccoyllo-Gonzalez , Jesus Blancas-Guillen , Giuliana Salazar-Alvarez , Pablo D. Valencia , Francisco J. Ruiz
Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, (2025), 57, pp. 89-97.
Received 20 February 2025
Accepted 4 July 2025

https://doi.org/10.14349/rlp.2025.v57.9

Resumen

Introducción: Los profesionales y aprendices de psicología clínica se enfrentan a un estrés laboral importante, que puede conducir a pensamiento negativo repetitivo (PNR). El Cuestionario de Pensamiento Perseverativo para Estudiantes de Psicología Clínica (PTQ-CPT) mide PNR en esta población. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo examinar las propiedades psicométricas y la invarianza de medición transnacional del PTQ-CPT en tres países de América Latina. Método: La muestra estuvo compuesta por 475 participantes de Colombia (n = 101), México (n = 253) y Perú (n = 121). Los participantes fueron profesionales y estudiantes de psicología clínica. Los datos se recopilaron por medio de una encuesta en línea. Se administró el PTQ-CPT, junto con medidas de síntomas depresivos, síntomas de ansiedad y confianza en las habilidades clínicas. Se realizaron análisis factorial confirmatorio, pruebas de invarianza de medición, un modelo de respuesta gradual y análisis correlacionales. Resultados: Una estructura unidimensional con un par de errores correlacionados proporcionó el mejor ajuste para el PTQ-CPT. Se confirmó la invariancia métrica entre países, mientras que la invariancia escalar fue respaldada por el criterio pragmático (diferencia en CFI < .01), pero no por el criterio estricto (diferencia en χ²). El modelo de respuesta graduada mostró que el ítem 5 tenía mayor capacidad informativa. Las puntuaciones del PTQ-CPT se correlacionaron positivamente con los síntomas depresivos (r = 0.45) y de ansiedad (r = 0.56), y negativamente con la confianza en las habilidades clínicas (r = -0.58). Conclusiones: El PTQ-CPT demostró propiedades psicométricas adecuadas e invarianza de medición transnacional. Es una herramienta confiable y válida para evaluar RNT en profesionales y estudiantes de psicología clínica en Colombia, México y Perú. Estos hallazgos respaldan el uso del PTQ-CPT en la investigación transcultural y la práctica clínica.

Palabras clave:
Pensamiento negativo repetitivo, personal de salud, estudiantes de ciencias de la salud, análisis psicométrico, rumia, preocupación

Abstract

Introduction: Clinical psychology professionals and trainees face significant occupational stress, which can lead to repetitive negative thinking (RNT). The Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire for Clinical Psychology Trainees (PTQ-CPT) measures RNT in this population. This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties and cross-national measurement invariance of the PTQ-CPT in three Latin American countries. Method: The sample comprised 475 participants from Colombia (n = 101), Mexico (n = 253), and Peru (n = 121). The participants were clinical psychology professionals and trainees. Data were collected via an online survey. The PTQ-CPT, along with measurements of depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and confidence in clinical skills, were administered. Confirmatory factor analysis, measurement invariance testing, a graded response model, and correlational analyses were conducted. Results: A unidimensional structure with a pair of correlated errors provided the best fit for the PTQ-CPT. Metric invariance across countries was confirmed, while scalar invariance was supported by the pragmatic criterion (difference in CFI < .01) but not by the strict criterion (difference in χ²). The graded response model showed that item 5 had the greatest informative capacity. PTQ-CPT scores correlated positively with depressive (r = .45) and anxiety (r = .56) symptoms, and negatively with confidence in clinical skills (r = -.58). Conclusions: The PTQ-CPT demonstrated adequate psychometric properties and cross-national measurement invariance. It is a reliable and valid tool for assessing RNT in clinical psychology professionals and trainees across Colombia, Mexico, and Peru. These findings support the use of the PTQ-CPT in cross-cultural research and clinical practice.

Keywords:
Repetitive negative thinking, health personnel, health science trainees, psychometric analysis, rumination, worry

Artículo Completo
Bibliografía

References

Amato, P. R., & DeBoer, D. D. (2001). The transmission of marital instability across generations relationship skills or commitment to marriage? Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(4), 1038–1051. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.01038

Avishai, O., Heath, M., & Randles, J. (2012). Marriage goes to school. Contexts, 11, 34–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536504212456180

Babbie, E. R. (1973). Survey research methods. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Banchand, L., & Caron, S. L. (2001). Ties that bind: A qualitative study of happy long-term marriages. Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 23(1), 105-121. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007828317271

Bingham, J. (2014). Family breakdown ‘could cost taxpayers £46bn’. The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/sex/divorce/10674267/Family-breakdown-could-cost-taxpayers-46bn.htmlhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/sex/divorce/10674267/Family-breakdown-could-cost-taxpayers-46bn.html

Blanchard, V. L., Hawkins, A. J., Baldwin, S. A., & Fawcett, E. B. (2009). Investigating the effects of marriage and relationship education on couples’ communication skills: A meta-analytic study. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015211

Bradford, A. B., Adle-Beader, F., Ketring, S. & Smith, T. A. (2013).  The role of

participants-facilitator demographics match in couple and relationship education.  Auburn, LA: Auburn University. Retrieved from http://www. alabamamarriage.org/documents/research/ahmreipublications/3.pdf

BusinessDictionary.com. (2018). Competence. Retrieved from http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/competence.html

Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.

Central Bureau of Statistics Curaçao (CBSC). (2014). Specificatie van type huishoudens en Grootte Tabel 2. Willemstad, Curaçao: CBS-Government. Retrieved from http://www.cbs.cw/cbs/themes/General/Publications/General-20150130125122.pdf

Chapman, G. (2005). The five love languages. Detroit: Thorndike Press.

Cone, D. J., & Foster, L. S. (2010). Dissertation and theses from start to finish: Psychology and related fields. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Crocker, J. (2008). From egosystem to ecosystem; implications for relationships, learning and well-being. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11771-006

Daigneault, P. M. (2013). The blind men and the elephant: A metaphor to illuminate the role of researchers and reviewer in social science. Methodological Innovations Online, 8(2), 28–89. https://doi.org/10.4256/mio.2013.015

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.

Fawcett, E. B., Hawkins, A. J., Blanchard, V. L., & Carroll, J. S. (2010). Do premarital education, programs really work? A meta-analytic study. Family Relations, 45(3), 201–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2010.00598.x

Frances, C., & Guzzo, S. (2009). Review of the dyadic adjustment scale. New York, NY: Argosy University.

Frola, P. (2012). Maestros competentes: A través de la planeación y la evaluación por competencias. México: Trillas.

Gottman, J., & Gottman, J. S. (2006). The art and science of love: A workshop for couples. Seattle, WA: The Gottman Institute.

Graham, J., Liu, Y., & Jeziorski, J. (2006). The dyadic adjustment scale: A reliability generalization meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(3), 701–717. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00284.x

Hahlweg, K., & Richter, D. (2010). Prevention of marital instability and distress. Results of an 11-year longitudinal follow-up study. Behavior Research and Therapy, 48(5), 377–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2009.12.010

Halford, W. K., Markman, H. J., Kling, G. H., & Stanley, S. M. (2003). Best practice in couple relationship education. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 29(3), 385–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1752-0606.2003.tb01214.x

Hartley, S., Barker, E., Baker, J., Seltzer, M., Mailick, M., & Greenberg, J. (2012). Marital satisfaction and life circumstances of grown children with autism across 7 years. Journal of Family Psychology, 26(5), 688–697. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029354

Hawkins, A. J., Blanchard, V. L., Baldwin, S. A., & Fawcett, E. B. (2008). Does marriage and relationship education work? A meta-analytic study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 723–734. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012584

Hawkins, A. J., Carroll, S. J., Doherty, W. J., & Willoughby, B. (2004). A comprehensive framework for marriage education. Cleveland, MN: Brigham Young University.

Hawkins, A. J., Stanley, S. M., Blanchard, V. L., & Albright, M. (2012). Exploring programmatic moderators of the effectiveness of marriage and relationship education programs: A meta-analytic study. Behavior Therapy, 43(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2010.12.006

Kang, S. (2010, April 23). Personality differences no. 1 cause for divorce. The Korea Times. Retrieved from http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/biz/2010/05/128_64743.html

Kristman V, Manno M, Coˆte´ P. (2004). Loss to follow-up in cohort studies: how much is too much? European Journal of Epidemiology, 19, 751-60.

Klann, N., Hahlweg, K., Baucom, D. H., & Kroeger, C. (2011). The effectiveness of couple therapy in Germany: A replication study. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 47(2), 200–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00164.x

Lou, S., & Klohnen, E. C. (2005). Assortative mating and marital quality in the newlywed: A couple-centred approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 304–326. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.304

Muehlenberg, B. (2014, July 19). Divorce now costs Australia $14 billion a year. Newsweekly. Retrieved from http://newsweekly.com.au/article.php?id=56649

Mrozek, A., & Walberg, R. (2009). Private choices, public costs; how failing families cost us all. Institute of Marriage and Family Canada. Retrieved from http://www.imfcanada.org/sites/default/files/Cost%20of%20Family%20Breakdown%20final_0.pdf

Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Ngazimbi, E. F., Daire, A. P., Soto, D., Carlson, R. G., & Munyon, M. D. (2013). Marital satisfaction between African immigrant and United States born married couples. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 23(2), 317–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2013.10820629

Orathinkal, J., & Alfons, V. (2015). Do demographics affect marital satisfaction? Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 33, 73–85.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00926230600998573

Papero, D. V. (1990). Bowen family ystems theory. Pearson.

Pinquart, M., & Teubert, D. (2010). A meta-analytic study of couple interventions during the transition to parenthood. Family Relations, 59(3), 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2010.00597.x

Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45,101-117

Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5(4), 357–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x

Scafidi, B. (2008). The taxpayer costs of divorce and unwed childbearing. New York, NY: Institute for American Values.

Schmitt, M., Kliegel, M., & Shapiro, A. (2007). Marital interaction in middle and old age: A predictor of marital satisfaction? International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 65(40), 283–300. https://doi.org/10.2190/AG.65.4.a

Shanmugavelayutham, K. (2012). Family competence and social development in relation to integrated child development scheme. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/dyutirajagirl/dyuti-ppt

Snyder, D. K., Castellani, A. M., & Whisman, M. A. (2006). Current status and future directions in couple therapy. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 317–344. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070154

Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15–28.

Stanley, S. M., Whitton, W. W., Sadberry, S. L., Clements, M. L., & Markman, H. J. (2006). Sacrifice as a predictor of marital outcome. Family Process, 45(3), 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2006.00171.x

Stone, E., & Shackelford, T. (2007). Marital satisfaction. In R. Baumeister & V. Vohs (Eds.), Encyclopedia of social psychology (pp. 541–545). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

van Widenfelt, B., Hosman, C., Schaap, C., & van der Staak, C. (1996). The prevention of relationship distress for couples at risk. Family Relations, 45(2), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.2307/585286

PDF