Trust as a driver of teacher well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic

La confianza como motor de bienestar docente durante la pandemia de COVID-19

Javier Labarthe-Carrara , Marisa Salanova , Susana Llorens
Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, (2024), 56, pp. 92-100.
Received 19 February 2024
Accepted 2 July 2024

https://doi.org/10.14349/rlp.2024.v56.10

Resumen

Introducción: Este estudio examina el impacto de la confianza organizacional en el bienestar de los docentes en la enseñanza virtual durante la pandemia de COVID-19 en Uruguay (N = 351; 270 mujeres, 81 hombres) utilizando para la comprensión el modelo de demandas-recursos laborales. Método: Esta se llevó a cabo mediante un modelo de ecuaciones estructurales. Resultados: Los resultados muestran que la confianza en líderes y colegas influye de manera positiva en los recursos personales percibidos y el engagement de los docentes. La confianza en los líderes se relaciona positivamente con los recursos organizacionales. El engagement se vincula de manera negativa con los problemas del sueño, mientras que las altas exigencias laborales se asocian con más tecnoestrés, afectando, además, los problemas de sueño de los docentes Conclusiones: Se destaca la importancia de la confianza organizacional en tiempos de cambio, subraya su papel en promover estados psicológicos positivos y facilitar el uso de recursos para mejorar el bienestar docente. La influencia de la confianza sobre el bienestar no es directa, sino que está mediada por una serie de variables.

Palabras clave:
Confianza organizacional, tecnoestrés, bienestar, sueño, engagement.

Abstract

Introduction: This study examines the impact of organisational trust on teachers’ well-being during virtual teaching throughout the COVID-19 pandemic in Uruguay (N = 351; 270 women, 81 men) using the Job Demands-Resources model for understanding. Method: This study was conducted by means of a Structural Equation Model. Results: The results show that trust in leaders and colleagues positively influences perceived personal resources and teachers’ engagement. Trust in leaders is positively related to organisational resources. Engagement is negatively linked to sleep problems, while high job demands are associated with more technostress, affecting teachers’ sleep problems. Conclusions: The importance of organisational trust in times of change is highlighted, emphasising its role in promoting positive psychological states and facilitating the use of resources to improve teachers’ well-being. The influence of trust on well-being is not direct but mediated by a series of variables.

Keywords:
Organisational trust, technostress, well-being, sleep, engagement.

Artículo Completo
Bibliografía

Adnan, M., Khan, A. U., & Hayee, R. (2021). Self-Efficacy as a function of Work Engagement with the mediating role of Organizational Trust in Higher Educational Institutions. iRASD Journal of Management, 3(2), 185-199. https://doi.org/mmvw

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273-285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056

Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. (2023). Job demands–resources theory: Ten years later. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10(2023), 25-53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-053933

Barber, B. (1983). The logic and limits of trust. Rutgers University Press.

Barber, L., Grawitch, M. J., & Munz, D. C. (2013). Are better sleepers more engaged workers? A self-regulatory approach to sleep hygiene and work engagement. Stress and Health, 29(4), 307-316. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2468

Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Sage.

Buunk, B. P., & Schaufeli, W. B. (1999). Reciprocity in interpersonal relationships: An evolutionary perspective on its importance for health and well-being. European Review of Social Psychology, 10(1), 259-291. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779943000080

Buysse, D. J., Reynolds, C. F., Monk, T. H., Berman, S. R., & Kupfer, D. J. (1989). The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Research, 28(2), 193-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4

Chou, H. L., & Chou, C. (2021). A multigroup analysis of factors underlying teachers’ technostress and their continuance intention toward online teaching. Computers and Education, 175, 104335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104335

Christianson, M. K., & Barton, M. A. (2021). Sensemaking in the time of COVID-19. Journal of Management Studies, 58(2), 572-576. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12658

De la Vega, R., Tomé-Pires, C., Solé, E., Racine, M., Castarlenas, E., Jensen, M. P., & Miró, J. (2015). The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: Validity and factor structure in young people. Psychological Assessment, 27(4), e22-e27. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000128

Dirks, K., & de Jong, B. (2022). Trust within the workplace: A review of two waves of research and a glimpse of the third. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 9, 247-276. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-083025

Fuglsang, L., & Jagd, S. (2015). Making sense of institutional trust in organizations: Bridging institutional context and trust. Organization, 22(1), 23-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508413496577

Green, A., Cohen-Zion, M., Haim, A., & Dagan, Y. (2017). Evening light exposure to computer screens disrupts human sleep, biological rhythms, and attention abilities. Chronobiology International, 34(7), 855-865. https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2017.1324878

Hough, C., Sumlin, C., & Green, K. W. (2020). Impact of ethics, trust, and optimism on performance. Management Research Review, 43(9), 1135-1155. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-09-2019-0409

Hoyle, R. H. (1995). The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 1-15). Sage Publications.

Huff, L., & Kelley, L. (2003). Levels of OT in individualist versus collectivist societies: A seven-nation study. Organization Science, 14(1), 81-90. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.1.81.12807

Hughes, M., Rigtering, J. C., Covin, J. G., Bouncken, R. B., & Kraus, S. (2018). Innovative behaviour, trust and perceived workplace performance. British Journal of Management, 29(4), 750-768. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12305

Instituto Nacional de Evaluación en Educación. (2020). Estudio de salud ocupacional docente (INEEd, Ed.), INEEd.

Kesebir, P., Gasiorowska, A., Goldman, R., Hirshberg, M. J., & Davidson, R. J. (2019). Emotional Style Questionnaire: A multidimensional measure of healthy emotionality. Psychological Assessment, 31(10), 1234-1246. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000745

Kline, R. B. (1998). Software review. Software programs for structural equation modeling: Amos, EQS, and LISREL. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 16(4), 343-364. https://doi.org/10.1177/073428299801600407

Knez, M., & Camerer, C. (1994). Creating expectational assets in the laboratory: Coordination in ‘weakest-link’ games. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S1), 101-119. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150908

Kramer, R. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 569-598. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.569

Kramer, R. M., & Lewicki, R. J. (2010). Repairing and enhancing trust: approaches to reducing OT deficits. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 245-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2010.487403

Kulikowski, K., Przytuła, S., & Sułkowski, Ł. (2022). E-learning? Never again! On the unintended consequences of COVID-19 forced e-learning on academic teacher motivational job characteristics. Higher Education Quarterly, 76(1), 174-189. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12314

Lee, Z.-H., & Chen, I.-H. (2021). The association between problematic internet use, psychological distress, and sleep problems during COVID-19. Sleep Epidemiology, 1, 100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleepe.2021.100005

Li, M., Pérez-Díaz, P. A., Mao, Y., & Petrides, K. V. (2018). A multilevel model of teachers’ job performance: Understanding the effects of trait emotional intelligence, job satisfaction, and organizational trust. Frontiers in Psychology9, 412117. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02420

Llorens, S., Cifre, E., & Nogareda, C. (2017). NTP 730. Tecnoestrés: concepto, medida e intervención psicosocial. Instituto Nacional de Seguridad y Salud en el Trabajo. https://ccooendesa.com/sites/default/files/2023-09/ntp_730.pdf

Lo Martire, V., Caruso, D., Palagini, L., Zoccoli, G., & Bastianini, S. (2020). Stress & sleep: A relationship lasting a lifetime. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews117, 65-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.08.024

Longmuir, F. (2023). Leading in lockdown: Community, communication and compassion in response to the COVID-19 crisis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 51(5), 1014-1030. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432211027634

MacKinnon, D. P., & Dwyer, J. H. (1993). Estimating mediated effects in prevention studies. Evaluation review17(2), 144-158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X9301700202

MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research39(1), 99-128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4.

MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 83-104. https://doi.org/cxc

Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., Hau, K.-T., & others. (1996). An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical properties. Advanced Structural Equation Modeling: Issues and Techniques, 315-353.

Martínez-Tur, V. (2003). La confianza en las organizaciones retos para la gestión de recursos humanos. Estudios Financieros, 245-246, 159-200. https://doi.org/10.51302/rtss.2003.8703

Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review20(3), 709-734. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335

McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24-59. https://doi.org/10.5465/256727

Ng, T. W. H., & Lucianetti, L. (2016). Within-individual increases in innovative behavior and creative, persuasion, and change self-efficacy over time: A social-cognitive theory perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(1), 14-34. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000029

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-hill.

Peiró, J. M., Ayala, Y., Tordera, N., Lorente, L., & Rodríguez, I. (2014). Bienestar sostenible en el trabajo: revisión y reformulación. Papeles del Psicólogo35(1), 5-14. https://www2.papelesdelpsicologo.es/pdf/1164.pdf#page=7

Pressley, T. (2021). Factors contributing to teacher Burnout during COVID-19. Educational Researcher, 50(5), 325-327. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211004138

Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393-404. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.926617

Salanova, M., Cifre, E., Martínez, I. M., & Llorens, S. (2007). Caso a caso en la prevención de riesgos psicosociales. Metodología WONT para una organización saludable. Lettera Publicaciones.

Salanova, M., Acosta-Antognoni, H., Llorens, S., & Le Blanc, P. (2021). We trust you! a multilevel-multireferent model based on organizational trust to explain performance. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(8), 4241 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084241

Salanova, M., Llorens, S., Cifre, E., & Martínez, I. M. (2012). We need a hero! Toward a validation of the healthy and resilient organization (HERO) Model. Group and Organization Management, 37(6), 785-822. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601112470405

Salanova, M., Llorens, S., Cifre, E., & Nogareda, C. (2007). NTP 730: Tecnoestrés: concepto, medida e intervención psicosocial. Instituto Nacional de Seguridad y Salud en el Trabajo.

Salfi, F., Lauriola, M., D’Atri, A., Amicucci, G., Viselli, L., Tempesta, D., & Ferrara, M. (2021). Demographic, psychological, chronobiological, and work-related predictors of sleep disturbances during the COVID-19 lockdown in Italy. Scientific Reports11(1), 11416. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90993-y

Tanis, M., & Postmes, T. (2005). A social identity approach to trust: Interpersonal perception, group membership and trusting behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(3), 413-424. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.256

Taris, T. W., Leisink, P. L., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2017). Applying occupational health theories to educator stress: Contribution of the job demands-resources model. Educator Stress: An Occupational Health Perspective, 237-259. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53053-6_11

Tripiana, J., & Llorens, S. (2015). Fomentando empleados engaged: el rol del líder y de la autoeficacia. Anales de Psicología, 31(2), 636-644. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.31.2.179561

Tummers, L. G., & Bakker, A. B. (2021). Leadership and job demands-resources theory: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 722080. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.722080

Weick, K. (2017). Perspective construction in organizational behavior. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113043

PDF