Resiliencia académica: la influencia del esfuerzo, las expectativas y el autoconcepto académico

Academic resilience: The influence of academic effort, expectations, and self-concept

Álvaro Menéndez-Aller , Álvaro Postigo , Covadonga González-Nuevo , Marcelino Cuesta , Rubén Fernández-Alonso , Marcos Álvarez-Díaz , Eduardo García-Cueto , José Muñiz
Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, (2021), 53, pp. 114-121.
Recibido el 16 de noviembre de 2020
Aceptado el 2 de agosto de 2021

https://doi.org/10.14349/rlp.2021.v53.13

Resumen

Introducción: La resiliencia académica consiste en obtener altas calificaciones a pesar de hallarse en una desventaja socioeconómica. En el presente estudio se observó si el esfuerzo, las expectativas y el autoconcepto académicos forman parte de la resiliencia académica o estarían explicando un buen rendimiento académico en general. Método: Los participantes, una población de 7479 adolescentes españoles (M = 13.87; DT = 0.82), fueron divididos en cuatro grupos según el rendimiento académico (Bueno-Malo) y el nivel socioeconómico (Clase alta-Clase baja). Se realizaron análisis de diferencias y regresiones logísticas binarias para detectar cuál de las variables empleadas explicaba el rendimiento académico en los grupos de igual nivel socioeconómico. También se estudió si el sexo influía en la pertenencia a los grupos de buen rendimiento. Resultados: Se observaron diferencias en el esfuerzo, las expectativas y el autoconcepto académicos en función de los cuatro grupos creados; los grupos de buen rendimiento académico obtuvieron puntuaciones más altas independientemente del nivel socioeconómico. Se observó que las expectativas y el autoconcepto académicos explicaban gran parte del rendimiento académico. Se detectó una tasa de mujeres significativamente más alta con relación a la de hombres en los grupos de mayor rendimiento. Conclusiones: Muchas variables, que se han considerado propias de los alumnos académicamente resilientes, explican un buen rendimiento académico, en general, independientemente del nivel socioeconómico.

Palabras clave
Resiliencia académica, nivel socioeconómico, rendimiento académico, adolescente, sexo

Abstract

Introduction: Academic resilience is defined as getting high marks despite being at a socioeconomic disadvantage. In the present study, it was observed whether Academic Effort, Expectations and Self-Concept are part of academic resilience or would be explaining a good academic performance in general. Method: The participants, a population of 7479 Spanish adolescents (M = 13.87; SD = 0.82), were divided into four groups according to academic performance (Good-Bad) and socioeconomic level (Upper class-Lower class). Analysis of differences and binary logistic regressions were performed to detect which of the variables used explained the academic performance in the groups of the same socioeconomic level. It was also studied whether sex influenced membership in the good performance groups. Results: Differences in Academic Effort, Expectations and Self-concept were found according to the four groups created; the groups with good academic performance obtained higher scores regardless of socioeconomic level. Expectations and academic self-concept were found to explain much of academic performance. A significantly higher rate of women than men was found in higher performance groups. Conclusions: Many variables that have been considered typical of academically resilient students explain good academic performance in general, regardless of socioeconomic status.

Keywords:
Academic resilience, socioeconomic level, academic performance, teenager, sex

Artículo Completo
Bibliografía

Agasisti, T., Avvisati, F. B., & Longobardi, S. (2018). Academic resilience: What schools and countries do to help disadvantaged students succeed in PISA (OECD Education Working Papers, 167). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/e22490ac-en

Alhadabi, A., & Karpinski, A. C. (2020). Grit, self-efficacy, achievement orientation goals, and academic performance in university students. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 519-535. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2019.1679202

Álvarez-Díaz, M., Gallego-Acedo, C., Fernández-Alonso, R., Muñiz, J., & Fonseca-Pedrero, E. (2021). Análisis de redes: una alternativa a los enfoques clásicos de evaluación de los sistemas educativos. Psicología Educativa (avance online). https://doi.org/10.5093/psed2021a16

American Psychology Association (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. APA.

Barragán, A. B., Pérez-Fuentes, M. C., Martos, Á., Simón, M. M., Molero M. M., Martínez-Sánchez, A., Sánchez-Beato, E. J., & Gázquez, J. J. (2016). Intervención y variables del personal docente y el centro escolar que modulan el rendimiento académico del alumno. European Journal of Child Development, Education and Psychopathology, 4(2), 89-97. https://doi.org/10.30552/ejpad.v4i2.37

Barriga, C. A., Rodriguez, C., & Ferreira, R. A. (2019). Factors that bias teacher expectations: Findings from Chile. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 51(3), 171-180. https://doi.org/10.14349/rlp.2019.v51.n3.4

Brandt, N. D., Lechner, C. M., Tetzner, J., & Rammstedt, B. (2020). Personality, cognitive ability, and academic performance: Differential associations across school subjects and school tracks. Journal of Personality, 88(2), 249-265. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12482

Brisson, B. M., Dicke, A.-L., Gaspard, H., Häfner, I., Flunger, B., Nagengast, B., & Trautwein, U. (2017). Short intervention, sustained effects: Promoting students’ math competence beliefs, effort, and achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 54(6), 1048-1078 https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217716084

Calderón, C., Navarro, D., Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. (2019). Multidimensional or essentially unidimensional? A multi-faceted factor-analytic approach for assessing the dimensionality of tests and items. Psicothema, 31(4), 450-457. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2019.153

Carrillo, E., Civís, M., Blanch, T. A., Longás, E., & Riera, J. (2018). Condicionantes del éxito y fracaso escolar en contextos de bajo nivel socioeconómico. Revista de Estudios y Experiencias en Educación, 2, 75-94. https://doi.org/10.21703/rexe.Especial2_201875944

Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Government Printing Office.

Cordero, J. M., & Manchón, C. (2014). Factores explicativos del rendimiento en educación primaria: un análisis a partir de TIMSS 2011. Estudios Sobre Educación, 27, 9-35. https://doi.org/10.15581/004.27.9-35

Cremér, H. (1999). Mathematical methods of statistics. Princeton University.

Enríquez, M., Insuasty, M., & Sarasty, M. (2018). Escuela para familias: un escenario de socialización entre la familia y la escuela. Revista Katharsis, 25, 94-107.

Farrington, C. A., Roderick, M., Allensworth, E., Nagaoka, J., Keyes, T. S., Johnson, D. W., & Beechum, N. O. (2012). Teaching adolescents to become learners. The role of noncognitive factors in shaping school performance: A critical literature review. University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research.

García-Crespo, F., Fernández-Alonso, R., & Muñiz, J. (2019a). Resilient and low performer students: Personal and family determinants in European countries. Psicothema, 31(4), 363-375. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2019.245

García-Crespo, F., Galián, B., Fernández-Alonso, R., & Muñiz, J. (2019b). Educational resilience in reading comprehension: Determinant factors in PIRLS-Europe. Revista de Educación, 384, 71-96. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2019-384-413

García-Crespo, F. J., Fernández-Alonso, R., & Muñiz, J. (2021). Academic resilience in European countries: The role of teachers, families, and student profiles. PLoS ONE 16(7), Article e0253409. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253409

García-Hoz, V. (1971). La evaluación del rendimiento escolar en el modelo de evaluación educativa. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 29(114), 115-133.

Gobierno del Principado de Asturias (2018). Evaluación de Diagnóstico Asturias 2017. Servicio de Ordenación Académica, Formación del Profesorado y Tecnologías Educativas.

Hernández, A., Ponsoda, V., Muñiz, J., Prieto, G., & Elosua, P. (2016). Revisión del modelo para evaluar la calidad de los tests utilizados en España. Papeles del Psicólogo, 37, 161-168.

Huang, C. (2011). Self-concept and academic achievement: A meta-analysis of longitudinal relations. Journal of School Psychology, 49(5), 505-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.07.001

IBM Corp. (2016). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0 [software]. IBM Corp.

Jacob, B. A. (2002). Where the boys aren’t: Noncognitive skills, returns to school and the gender gap in higher education. Economics of Education Review, 21(6), 589-598.

Kannangara, C. S., Allen, R. E., Waugh, G., Nahar, N., Khan, S., Rogerson, S., & Carson, J. (2018). All that glitters is not grit: Three studies of grit in university students. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1539. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01539

Lamas, H. (2015). Sobre el rendimiento escolar. Propósitos y Representaciones, 3(1), 313-386. https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2015.v3n1.74

Le, T.-T., Tran, T., Trinh, T.-P., Nguyen, C.-T., Nguyen, T.-P., Vuong, T.-T., Vu, T.-H., Bui, D.-Q.,Vuong, H.-M., Hoang, P.-H., Nguyen, M.-H., Ho, M.-T., & Vuong, Q.-H. (2019). Reading habits, socioeconomic conditions, occupational aspiration and academic achievement in Vietnamese junior high school students. Sustainability, 11(18), Article 5113. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11185113

Lee, J., & Shute, V. J. (2010). Personal and social-contextual factors in K-12 academic performance: An integrative perspective on student learning. Educational Psychologist, 45(3), 185-202 https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2010.493471

Lenhard, W., & Lenhard, A. (2017). Calculation of effect sizes. Psychometrica. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17823.92329

Liu, X., & Lu, K. (2008). Student performance and family socioeconomic status: Results from a survey of compulsory education in Western China. Chinese Education & Society, 41(5), 70-83. https://doi.org/10.2753/ced1061-1932410505

Lozano-González, L., & García-Cueto, E. (2000). El rendimiento escolar y los trastornos emocionales y comportamentales. Psicothema, 12(2), 340-343.

Martín-Lagos, M. D. (2018). Educación y desigualdad: una metasíntesis tras el 50 aniversario del Informe Coleman. Revista de Educación, 380, 186-209. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2017-380-377

Méndez-Giménez, A., Checchini-Estrada, J. A., & Rodríguez-González, P. (2020). Perceived competence (three-dimensional), motivational regulations and self-efficacy in physical education. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 52, 51-62. https://doi.org/10.14349/rlp.2020.v52.6

Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte (2017). PIRLS 2016: Estudio internacional del progreso en competencia lectora. Informe español. Instituto Nacional de Evaluación Educativa.

Montes, I. C., & Lerner, J. (2011). Rendimiento académico de los estudiantes de pregrado de la Universidad Eafit: Perspectiva cuantitativa. Universidad Eafit.

Muelas, A., & Beltrán, J. A. (2011). El rendimiento escolar y los trastornos emocionales y comportamentales. Revista de Psicología y Educación, 31(6), 173-195.

Muñoz-Izquierdo, C., & Guzmán, J. T. (2010). Una exploración de los factores determinantes del rendimiento escolar en la educación primaria. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Educativos (México), 40(2), 167-191.

OECD (2016). PISA 2015 results (Volume i): Excellence and equity in education, PISA. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en

OECD (2018). The resilience of students with an immigrant background: Factors that shape well-being, OECD reviews of migrant education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264292093-en

Pedrosa, I., Juarros-Basterretxea, J., Robles-Fernández, A., Basteiro, J., & García-Cueto, E. (2015). Pruebas de bondad de ajuste en distribuciones simétricas. ¿Qué estadístico utilizar? Universitas Psychologica, 14, 245-254. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy14-1.pbad

Peña-Suárez, E., Fernández-Alonso, R., & Muñiz, J. (2009). Estimación del valor añadido de los centros escolares. Aula Abierta, 37(1), 3-18.

Polirstok, S. (2017). Strategies to improve academic achievement in secondary school students: perspectives on grit and mindset. SAGE Open, 7(4), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017745111

Postigo, Á., Cuesta, M., Fernández-Alonso, R., García-Cueto, E., & Muñiz, J. (2021). Temporal stability of grit and school performance in adolescents: a longitudinal perspective. Psicología Educativa, 27(1), 77-84. https://doi.org/10.5093/psed2021a4

Rodríguez-Rodríguez, D., & Guzmán, R. (2019). Socio-familial risk factors and personal protective variables of academic performance in secondary education students. Psicothema, 31(2), 142-148. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.213

Servicio de Evaluación Educativa (2017). Éxito contra todo pronóstico: el alumnado académicamente resiliente. Informe Evaluación, 12, 1-8.

Smithers, L. G., Sawyer, A. C. P., Chittleborough, C. R., Davies, N. M., Smith, G. D., & Lynch, J. W. (2018). A systematic review and meta-analysis of effects of early life non-cognitive skills on academic, psychosocial, cognitive and health outcomes. Nature Human Behaviour, 2, 867-880. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0461-x

Suárez-Álvarez, J., Fernández-Alonso, R., & Muñiz, J. (2014). Self-concept, motivation, expectations, and socioeconomic level as predictors of academic performance in mathematics. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 118-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.10.019

Thomson, S. (2018). Achievement at school and socioeconomic background—an educational perspective. Npj Science of Learning, 3(1), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-018-0022-0

Timmerman, M. E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 209-220. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023353

Vaknin-Nusbaum, V., Nevo, E., Brande, S., & Gambrell, L. (2018). Developmental aspects of reading motivation and reading achievement among second grade low achievers and typical readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(3), 438-454. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12117

Voyer, D., & Voyer, S. D. (2014). Gender differences in scholastic achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1174-1204. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036620

Wills, G., & Hofmeyr, H. (2019). Academic resilience in challenging contexts: Evidence from township and rural primary schools in South Africa. International Journal of Education Research, 98, 192-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.08.001

Woitschach, P., Fernández-Alonso, R., Martínez-Arias, R., & Muñiz, J. (2017). Influencia de los centros escolares sobre el rendimiento académico en Latinoamérica. Revista de Psicología y Educación, 12(2), 138-154. https://doi.org/10.23923/rpye2017.12.152

World Medical Association (2013). Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. WMA.

PDF